| dc.description.abstract |
This project explores the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) as research assistants by developing an advanced research paper reviewer that surpasses current leading tools such as AI-Scientist developed by SakanaAI. Initially, using foundational APIs from Google Gemini and OpenAI’s GPT models, we created a baseline reviewer that generated generic feedback in adherence to target conference guidelines. To enhance its effectiveness, we implemented a sophisticated pipeline incorporating agentic patterns and reflection-based models, enabling iterative refinement of reviews for increased specificity and accuracy. Using ExtractorAPI, the system retrieves conference-specific review guidelines, allowing the LLM to dynamically split research papers into independent sections for detailed evaluation. In subsequent iterations, we transitioned to a LangGraph-based architecture, adopting a multi agent approach with a supervisor node and integrated tools like internet search and Semantic Scholar to emulate a professional reviewer’s comprehensive capabilities. This enhanced workflow not only automates the review process but also delivers high-quality, conference-aligned feedback more efficiently than existing solutions. Our results demonstrate the potential of LLMs to significantly streamline the research review process, offering scalable and consistent support to researchers. |
en_US |